First we had the PCCW
share-splitting scandal. Now, the major players in the Hong Kong cricket community have tried to get in on the act by effectively divvying up their holdings in the Hong Kong Cricket Association and doling them out before the Annual General Meeting. Tried, but ultimately failed, in a shambolic series of events that the HKCA will attempt to clear up by the end of the month.
Hong Kong cricket has long been a powder keg waiting to explode and the job of successive committees has been to ensure that the sparks are kept away from the explosives. As in the wider world, where the traditional powerhouses, Australia and England, have had to cede power to India and its subcontinental neighbours, as the "Indianisation of the ICC" follows its inexorable path, so locally the traditional clubs, Hong Kong Cricket Club and Kowloon Cricket Club, have been facing a growing challenge to their dominance from the so-called independent clubs for the past 15 years.
HKCC and KCC may have the grounds, but the likes of the Pakistan Association, which begins its meetings with prayers from an imam, and Little Sai Wan Cricket Club have the numbers. These days it's not unusual for all members of a Hong Kong representative side to be drawn from players with a subcontinental, overwhelmingly Pakistani, background. It's not stretching things too far to say that the one thing that has prevented the independents from mounting a successful assault on the top positions at the HKCA thus far has been their genius for infighting.
The build-up to this year's AGM last Friday (29 May) was especially spicy, with Sri Lankan-born SCMP cricket writer Alvin Sallay stirring the pot with a piece on 23 May in which he reported long-standing HKCA president Terry Smith as saying that the bid of candidates from the independent camp for the posts of president and chairman was a "naked grab for money and power". In their turn, the men from the Pakistan Association and LSW were unafraid to play the race card by saying that their bid was driven by their desire to stop a "growing divide" in the game.
If the seeds for recent events were sown many years ago, they were watered in April (appropriately enough on April Fool's Day) when members of the Association were notified of an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held at the end of the month. The main purpose of the meeting was to bring the HKCA's Articles of Association fully into line with the companies ordinance. This gave everyone the chance to reacquaint themselves with one of the most important parts of the Association's
de facto constitution, the clause which states that only those who are members when the agenda is sent out with the required 21 days' notice will be entitled to vote at the AGM.
Blissfully unaware of this, the two sides embarked on the mother and father of all membership drives, one to put Democrat registration of black voters at the last US election to shame. HKCC were the first to submit their bulk application (coming up with 161 new cricket fans), while the independents amassed 230. At HK$420 a head, this represented quite a windfall for the HKCA, still reeling from their HK$1.8 million loss at last year's International Cricket Sixes.
But it appears that the clubs were not the only ones to be ignorant of the rules. The same applied to those who are paid to manage and run the HKCA from their offices in Olympic House. Accordingly, they announced on the HKCA's website that the deadline for membership applications for the AGM was Friday 22 May, a week before the meeting. No less an authority than HKCA treasurer, Dinesh Tandon, was confirming this in the SCMP as late as 26 May: "Anyone who is registered [by 22 May] and is a fully paid-up member can vote at the AGM".
The next day, long-standing HKCA secretary, John Cribbin, stepped in with a letter to members in which he finally apprised them of the rules before informing disappointed would-be new members that they could have their money back or wait until 2010 and "have a vote" then. Less obvious was why Cribbin felt the need to share that around 200 membership applications had been paid for in cash, adding that such bulk payments were "somewhat unusual".
After all that, the meeting itself was something of a damp squib, as a back-room deal ended up with the all-important chairman's position remaining unfulfilled as both incumbent and challenger withdrew their nominations, leaving the executive committee to decide who the next chairman will be.
According to Alvin Sallay, Dinest Tandon is hot favourite for the post. Perhaps someone could lend him a copy of the Articles of Association in the meantime.